![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
Bookbinding and The Care of Books |
||||||||||||||||||||
| A Handbook for Amateurs Bookbinders & Librarians by Douglas Cockerell with Drawings by Noel Rooke and other Illustrations New York 1902 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Book binding Chapter XIX |
||||||||||||||||||||
| The work of a sub-committee, which was composed of chemists especially conversant with the treatment of leather, was directed specially to the elucidation of the following points: an investigation of the nature of the decay of leather used for bookbinding; an examination of the causes which produced this decay; a research into the best methods of preparing Le leather for bookbinding; and a consideration of the points required to be dealt with in the preservation of books. "As to the suitability of various leathers, the |
||||||||||||||||||||
| sub-committee came to the conclusion that of the old leathers (15th and 16th century), white pigskin, probably alum (tanned,' is the most durable, but its excessive hardness and want of flexibility renders this leather unsuitable for most modern work. Old brown calf has lasted fairly well, but loses its flexibility, and becomes stiff and brittle when exposed to light and air. Some of the white tawed skins of the 15th and 16th century, other than white pigskin, and probably deerskin, have lasted very well. Some 15th and 16th century sheepskin bindings have remained soft and flexible, but the surface is soft, and usually much damaged by friction. Vellum seems to have lasted fairly well, but is easily influenced by atmospheric changes, and is much affected by light. Early specimens of red morocco from the 16th to the end of the 18th century were found in good condition, and of all the leathers noticed, this seems to be the least affected by the various conditions to which it had been subjected. In the opinion of the committee, most of this leather has been tanned with sumac or some closely allied tanning material. Morocco bindings earlier than 186o were generally found to be in fairly good condition, but morocco after that date seems to be much less reliable, and in many cases has become utterly rotten. During the latter part of the 18th century it became customary to pare down calf until it was as thin as paper. Since about 1830 hardly any really sound calf seems to have been used, as, whether thick or thin, it appears generally to have perished. Sheepskin bindings of the early part of the century are many of them still in good condition. Since about 1860 sheepskin as sheepskin is hardly to be found. Sheepskins are grained in imitation of other leathers, and these imitation-grained leathers are generally found to be in a worse condition than any of the other bindings, except, perhaps, some of the very thin calfskin. Undyed modern pigskin seems to last well, but some colored pigskin bindings had entirely perished. Modern leathers dyed with the aid of sulphuric acid are all to be condemned. In nearly every case Russia leather was found to have become rotten, at least in bindings of the last fifty years." On the question of the causes of the decay noticed and the best methods of preparing leather in the future, I may quote the following: |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Chapter XIX Part 3 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to Chapter XIX Part 1 |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to Chapter Index |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2005 aboutbookbinding.com All Rights Reserved email: info@aboutbookbinding.com |
||||||||||||||||||||