![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||||||
- About Bookbinding - |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
Famous Book Binders |
|||||||
Grolier and The Renascence Part 3His praises are repeated in many a dedication from the scholars and the publisher printers of the period. Many a book was brought out wholly, or partly, at his expense. The managers of the Aldine press often borrowed money from him, and never applied in vain. He quarreled once with Benvenuto Cellini but he was a close friend of Geoffroy Tory. He was a scholar, as is attested by the elegant Latinity of his extant correspondence.
He was an artist of not a little skill with the pencil, as a sketch in his copy of the "Maxims" of Erasmus proves. Fournier thought that perhaps Grolier himself designed the graceful arabesques and interwoven bands which characterize the covers of his books. "Compared with the other bindings of the same time, and of the same country. Those of Grolier are distinguished by an unequalled and unfailing taste." They are closely akin to the bindings executed for Aldus in Venice, and to the bindings then made by the Italian workmen elsewhere in Italy. In France, and even in England: but they are somehow superior; they have a note of their own; they are the result of a finer artistic sense; and the longer I study the books bound during the Italian renascence, the more I am inclined to agree with Fournier when he asserts that Grolier, "with Italian methods, created a French art." Certainly he gave to his library so definite an individuality that the volumes which composed it three hundred years ago are now treated as veritable works of art; they have their catalogue, like the pictures of a great painter, or the plates of a great engraver; they are numbered. Every existing book bound for Grolier has its pedigree, and is traced lovingly from catalogue to catalogue of the great collectors. The beauty of the Grolier bindings is in the lavish and tasteful ornamentation of the sides. In the early days of printing, and when the traditions of the days of manuscripts still were dominant, the shelves of a library inclined like a reading-desk, and the handsome volumes lay on their sides, taking their ease. Books then were not packed together on level shelves as they are now, shoulder to shoulder, like common soldiers; but each stately tome stood forward by itself singly, like an officer. So the broad sides of the ample folios seemed to invite decoration.
|
|||||||
< Grolier and Renascence Part 2 |
Grolier and Renascence Part 4> | ||||||
© aboutbookbinding.com All rights reserved our email |
|||||||